股市 | 1997
在Investalks 看到的一段回复：
In 1997, market didn't drop directly from 1300 to 250. It dropped from 1300 to 1000, you panic and cut lost. It rebounded to 1100, you thought better don't miss the chance, so you jumped in. It then fell to 800, you cut lost again. Then it rebounced to 950, you tempted by the opportunity and rushed in again. And it dropped to 600, you panic and cut lost again.
The cycles kept repeating until you are totally sucked dry. By the time KLCI reached 250, you either run out of bullets or you are numb you didn't bother or dare to do anything
That is 1997 for you.
大家需引以为鉴。每次加码前都要三思再三思。
In 1997, market didn't drop directly from 1300 to 250. It dropped from 1300 to 1000, you panic and cut lost. It rebounded to 1100, you thought better don't miss the chance, so you jumped in. It then fell to 800, you cut lost again. Then it rebounced to 950, you tempted by the opportunity and rushed in again. And it dropped to 600, you panic and cut lost again.
The cycles kept repeating until you are totally sucked dry. By the time KLCI reached 250, you either run out of bullets or you are numb you didn't bother or dare to do anything
That is 1997 for you.
大家需引以为鉴。每次加码前都要三思再三思。
股市 | 1997
![股市 | 1997]()
Reviewed by Angelpoiwoon
on
19:21
Rating:
很好的提醒。
回复删除今天很多股都fan反弹了5%
我们现在验证着2014-2015是否也如此
删除cut loss 是错误的决定，除非基本面变差了，
删除或则清楚自己的公司和风险存在，
20% － 30% 加码 法我就不信等不到反弹，
前提是要加对公司，
到时敢不敢加码也是个问好，
毕竟空有理论，没有实战。
= wendy =
太频密的拉低平均价是不归路
删除2cent opinion
恩，认同UNCLE JIM 所以要拟一个计划，出手次数，
删除风险和其他的因素。
同样的东西，在不同的人看到，领悟成不同的东西，就会做出不同的选择。
回复删除各安天命
谢谢分享，这可是许多人都会犯下的错误呢。
回复删除谢谢分享。要留意本地机构,散户还有外资的买盘,从这里应该可以看出来到底会起还是跌。现在都是本地机构在买,所以他们一定会推高来出货的。愚见
回复删除所以對我來說，動作比較少會比較好。
回复删除今天一开场就青色，看来本地机构继续吸纳，继续观望好了。
回复删除